Acer Swift 1 Sf114 32 Ssd

As some of yous may already know the SF114-32 comes with an internal Thou.two slot that allows for the expansion or upgrade of the storage drive. From the factory this model comes equipped with a decent 64GB eMMC v.1 SSD that suffices for basic uses only leaves much to be desired. For ane, it is slow and for two it is express in capacity. This laptop, is essentially a netbook meant to apply web services and products such equally Google Cloud or DropBox but it works for most users who just need a laptop for browsing the web and editing those few documents for schoolhouse or work and saving a few files locally. But if y'all're after something faster and larger in capacity the M.2 slot is a huge selling indicate of this fanless netbook.

The M.2 slot is capable of accepting M.ii 2280 SSDs in the SATA and supposedly NVME flavor. More on NVME drives to come. Yard.2 SATA drives are very inexpensive, easy to install and configure, readily available in small to large capacities and 1 of the easiest means to increase storage performance from the storage system of the SF114-32. I can easily double if not triple the functioning of the storage system past replacing the eMMC SSD equally your primary SSD. Every bit virtually computers have moved onto M.2 PCIe NVME SSDs, SATA SSDs remain as a viable low-price selection. One can take a 1TB-2TB SATA SSD that performs very well in this entry-level laptop. SATA is notwithstanding a plenty fast interface and for budget PCs like this is unlikely to make much difference in 24-hour interval-to-twenty-four hours use. Where yous will notice the difference will be your wallet and upkeep. The extra cost of an NVME SSD may not always be necessary.

For this example I used an M.2 SATA SSD I happened to have lying effectually. My SSD is pretty old and very tedious in relative terms but still much faster than the onboard eMMC SSD. The exact make and model is as follows:

Micron M510 128GB SATA 6GB/s 2280 MLC MTFDDAV128MAZ-1AE1ZABHA

Here'due south how it performs. I ran a few SSD benchmarks using Crystal Disk Marking 6.0.2 x64 but i intend on using other benchmark tools at a later date. The first run was on a stock unmodified drive. As you lot tin encounter, performance surpasses that of the onboard eMMC SSD. The second run I shrunk the chief Windows partition and unallocated 25% of the drive's available storage space. Unallocated space allows the SSD to maintain height performance even when filled. I fabricated certain to TRIM the drive.

Beginning run:

2d run:

Operation improved e'er so slightly. Probably not much to make any real world divergence or feel. I actually just wanted to show that upgrading the eMMC SSD to a M.2 SATA SSD makes a difference in the storage drive system. This volition interpret to a faster calculator overall and higher storage capacity to the end user. Its a win-win situation.

For reference, here is what my SF114-32 SanDisk DF4064 eMMC 5.one drive is capable of. As you can, it is slower than my SATA SSD especially in Seq Q32T1 Read MB/s also as other metrics. Id say you're getting a decent bump in storage functioning and capacity past going with a M.2 SATA SSD.

Equally an aside, I do not know how this will make an impact to the battery life. I imagine it might hurt it some but can look into this farther. It'll probably exist wise to shop for the most free energy efficient M.ii SATA SSD i can buy.

Take y'all guys installed a M.2 SATA SSD in your SF114-32? If so, which make and model?

Take you lot noticed any decrease in bombardment life afterwards having switched over to an K.2 SATA SSD?

Please share your thoughts beneath.

Source: https://community.acer.com/en/discussion/557860/2018-acer-swift-1-sf114-32-m-2-sata-ssd

Posted by: currylithapablout.blogspot.com

Share this post